英文摘要 |
This study is for specializing consideration that our nation set up public servants’ placement sectors and departments. Owing to the division is too complicated, it is not only hider staff flexibility, but also result in transferred and cultivated general-talented-person difficulty. The research use Literature Review, Deep Interview and Focus Group Meeting methods to accumulate and analyze data to review it’s proper or not? Need to simplify or merge? On the ‘placement sector and department’ issue of our nation’s public servants, our important findings are as follows: the direction of reform is the placement sectors and departments should be simplified and merged; on the contrast, the specific placement sector and department weigh out additional opinions: on reforming strategies, we prefer stepwise adjustment and graduate march. However, the placement sectors’ and departments’ establishment, in principle: a)flexibility, b)simplification merge, and c)generally talent person. Besides, the administrative sections emphasize generally-talent person orientation; on the contrast, the technical sections do professional orientation (experts). By the way, they are also experts on the table on and lowing eleven-grade. The added proposal auditing by the Ministry of Civil Service should consider the needs: a)necessities. b)urgency. c)involving wide area. The placement sector-and-department and exam subjects are up-and-down stream relationship; furthermore, linked adjustments. Besides, the review prior direction is case of: Specular Exam and General Exam less amount of examinees and for responding the specific needs in order to cool down the reform attach. The placement sector and department be established by three institutions: a)‘one placement department, one subject’, b)‘one placement department, multiple subjects’, c)’one subject inflecting multiple placement departments. Especially, the Senior Exam (third level) obviously doesn’t follow the principle of ‘one placement department, one subject’ rule. So the outcome will shun down the framework operations, the engineering is not so easy. At last, this research provides suggestions as below: To concrete proposals both of administrative sections and of technical sections with placement sectors-and-departments. Meanwhile, the reformed strategies: a. preferred stepwise adjustment and graduate march. b. on the consensus parts – enlarge span, the other parts (less consensus) – shelve disputes and continue to searching for alternatives to simplify and merge. Besides, strengthen the connection of civil servants for cohesion the-next-steps engineering consensus. We have to research, point to public-servant rights’ conflict and be adopted to relatedly supporting measures. |