| 英文摘要 |
This study is for specializing consideration that our nation set up public servants’
placement sectors and departments. Owing to the division is too complicated, it is not only
hider staff flexibility, but also result in transferred and cultivated general-talented-person
difficulty. The research use Literature Review, Deep Interview and Focus Group Meeting
methods to accumulate and analyze data to review it’s proper or not? Need to simplify or
merge? On the ‘placement sector and department’ issue of our nation’s public servants, our
important findings are as follows: the direction of reform is the placement sectors and
departments should be simplified and merged; on the contrast, the specific placement
sector and department weigh out additional opinions: on reforming strategies, we prefer
stepwise adjustment and graduate march. However, the placement sectors’ and
departments’ establishment, in principle: a)flexibility, b)simplification merge, and c)generally
talent person. Besides, the administrative sections emphasize generally-talent person
orientation; on the contrast, the technical sections do professional orientation (experts). By
the way, they are also experts on the table on and lowing eleven-grade. The added proposal
auditing by the Ministry of Civil Service should consider the needs: a)necessities. b)urgency.
c)involving wide area. The placement sector-and-department and exam subjects are
up-and-down stream relationship; furthermore, linked adjustments. Besides, the review
prior direction is case of: Specular Exam and General Exam less amount of examinees and for
responding the specific needs in order to cool down the reform attach. The placement
sector and department be established by three institutions: a)‘one placement department,
one subject’, b)‘one placement department, multiple subjects’, c)’one subject inflecting
multiple placement departments. Especially, the Senior Exam (third level) obviously doesn’t
follow the principle of ‘one placement department, one subject’ rule. So the outcome will
shun down the framework operations, the engineering is not so easy. At last, this research
provides suggestions as below: To concrete proposals both of administrative sections and of
technical sections with placement sectors-and-departments. Meanwhile, the reformed
strategies: a. preferred stepwise adjustment and graduate march. b. on the consensus parts
– enlarge span, the other parts (less consensus) – shelve disputes and continue to searching
for alternatives to simplify and merge. Besides, strengthen the connection of civil servants
for cohesion the-next-steps engineering consensus. We have to research, point to
public-servant rights’ conflict and be adopted to relatedly supporting measures. |