跳到主要內容區塊

考試院擬定之「聘用人員人事條例」草案對現行公務人員體制影響之研究

考試院擬定之「聘用人員人事條例」草案對現行公務人員體制影響之研究

柯三吉

《摘要》

本文旨在探討考試院擬定之「聘用人員人事條例」草案對現行 公務人員體制之影響。在理論上,本文引用彈性雇用關係架構,強 調運用「任意關係」機制,可避免非常任公務人員運用「追擊權 利」,造成「官僚混亂的問題」。惟本條例草案尚未經立法院審議 通過,因此,在研究方法上,本文並非對執行問題和影響進行全面 性調查研究,而係就各級政府指派出席人員在十場座談會中所提出 對本條例草案之意見,並比較美國、英國、德國和日本等國相關法 規規定,進行綜合分析。最後,本文對本條例草案提出以下政策性 建議:(1)應堅持公平、公開之功績原則,相關條文仍應符合憲法 和公務人員考試法之規定,(2)本條例草案所規範之國家與聘用人 員之法律關係,宜界定為「私法契約關係」,(3)「機關」和「獨 立機關」之聘用人員比例,仍以不超過預算員額數 5% 為原則,(4)各級地方政府應依聘用人員結構需求之類別、人口聚居數等因 素,訂定不同進用比例,惟宜限制在 10% 至 20% 之間,(5)本條例如立法通過,宜先由中央政府實施,再評估和修正後,方始全 國全面實施。

[關鍵詞]:聘用人員人事條例、彈性雇用關係、功績制原則

 

A Study of the Impact of the Draft Regulations for Contract-Based Employees on the Current Civil Service System

Sun-Jyi Ke

Abstract

This paper attempts to study the impacts of the Draft Regulations for Contract-Based Employees (DRCE) proposed by the Examination Yuan on the current civil service system. The theoretical framework of this study is based on the flexibility employment paradigm which describes how to avoid bureaucratic chaos caused by the dismissal of contract-based employees. This is an empirical study that was supported by ten seminars held in Taiwan and comparative analyses of contract-based employees regulations in the USA, the UK, Germany and Japan. The policy implications are as follows: (1) The related articles of DRCE should be in accordance with the Constitution and Civil Service Examination Act, (2) Legal relationships between the government and contract-based employees regulated by DRCE could be defined as private contracts, (3) The percentage of contract-based employees in administrative or independent agencies should not exceed 5% of the total employees in each agency, (4) The 10% to 20% percentage of contract-based employees of local governments should be based on different criteria as recommended by each local government, (5) DRCE enacted by Legislative Yuan should be implemented by the central government first and then local governments .

Keywords: Draft Regulations for Contract-Based Employees, flexibility employment, merit principles.