政府雖然具有「社會價值的權威分配」的功能，但是，每當政府試圖透過行政系統，給予某一特定道德價值正當性時，卻飽受來自各方的指責與反彈，要如何能夠評估道德性質的政策之執行績效，更是難上加難。
本文透過德菲法及AHP方法蒐集資料後發現，過往的動物保護行政業務評估時，有過於重視「輸入導向」指標的傾向，雖已往「績效導向」、「結果導向」與「公民驅動導向」指標演進，但「脈絡構面」指標仍未受到重視。因此，在臺灣未來將面臨越發頻繁的道德爭議政策之時，學界有必要對此類指標投注更多心血，才能妥善解決當下面臨的各種道德政策（包括動物保護政策）之困境。
How to Evaluate Administrative Performance of Morality Policy? A Case of Taiwan Local Governments’ Animal Protection
Chuanghsien Wu
Abstract
Every time when government tries to give legitimacy to some kinds of morality (such as gay marriage or legalizing abortion), it has to face criticisms from the outside world. That makes it difficult not only to implement a policy, but also to evaluate administrative performance.
In this study, the author applies Delphi and AHP method to the research and makes some conclusions. It is demonstrated that, in the past, animal-protection administrative indicators focused too much on the “input-oriented” perspective. Though it has also involved “performance-oriented”, “result-oriented” and “civil-drive oriented” perspectives, it still neglects “context-oriented” perspectives. When Taiwan is increasingly confronted with various morality issues, it has to concentrate more on “context-oriented” indicators so that these difficulties caused by morality policy (including animal protection policy) can be solved.
Keywords: morality, morality policy, evaluation indicator, animal protection